Reducing uncertainties in decadal variability of the global carbon budget with multiple datasets
Wei Li , Philippe Ciais, Yilong Wang, Shushi Peng, Grégoire Broquet, Ashley P. Ballantyne, Josep G. Canadell, Leila Cooper, Pierre Friedlingstein, Corinne Le Quéré, Ranga B. Myneni, Glen P. Peters, Shilong Piao, and Julia Pongratz.
PNAS Early Edition. Published 31 October 2016.
Conventional calculations of the global carbon budget infer the land sink as a residual between emissions, atmospheric accumulation, and the ocean sink. Thus, the land sink accumulates the errors from the other flux terms and bears the largest uncertainty. Here, we present a Bayesian fusion approach that combines multiple observations in different carbon reservoirs to optimize the land (B) and ocean (O) carbon sinks, land use change emissions (L), and indirectly fossil fuel emissions (F) from 1980 to 2014. Compared with the conventional approach, Bayesian optimization decreases the uncertainties in B by 41% and in O by 46%. The L uncertainty decreases by 47%, whereas F uncertainty is marginally improved through the knowledge of natural fluxes. Both ocean and net land uptake (B + L) rates have positive trends of 29 ± 8 and 37 ± 17 Tg C·y−2 since 1980, respectively. Our Bayesian fusion of multiple observations reduces uncertainties, thereby allowing us to isolate important variability in global carbon cycle processes.
- Download paper: http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2016/10/25/1603956113
- Contact lead author: Wei Li